New — Lead-First Collaborative PRD workflow

From kickoff to a conflict-free PRD in days, not weeks

RoboRequirements interviews every stakeholder asynchronously with role-aware AI personas, keeps them blind to each other's answers, and flags every duplicate and contradiction — before the PRD ships, and long before the code.

Start your first projectSee the workflow
app.roborequirements.com/pocketbank/requirements

PocketBank Mobile BankingPRJ-042

23 requirements · 4 sections · 3 stakeholders

Detection sweep · clean
REQ-012All customer data is stored and processed within the EUNon-negotiable
REQ-018Biometric login with PIN fallback for every sessionMust ×4
REQ-03199.99% uptime on payment processing, EU-resident failoverArchitect
REQ-044Queue transfers while offline for later executionConflicts · REQ-012
REQ-027Push notification within 5s of every transactionNice ×2
faster from concept to PRD
0%
for stakeholders to complete interviews
0h
saved per project for the Lead
0 hrs
of conflicts flagged before the PRD ships
0%
The Lead-First workflow

One baseline. Every expert. Zero meetings.

Draft, lock, elicit, reconcile, adjudicate — a PRD where every requirement was authored, evaluated, or explicitly contested by the right expert.

Phase 0–2 · Frame & Lock

Draft the baseline. Lock what's non-negotiable.

The Lead drafts PRD v1 in-app with the PM persona; the system numbers it into atomic requirements across canonical sections. Hard constraints get locked 🔒 — they can be contested, but never silently edited away.

  • Guided v1 drafting with the BMAD PM persona
  • Atomic, numbered requirements with AI-suggested facet tags
  • Stakeholders appointed per section with probe briefs, deadlines and disclosure dials
app.roborequirements.com/pocketbank/requirements

PocketBank Mobile BankingPRJ-042

23 requirements · 4 sections · 3 stakeholders

Detection sweep · clean
REQ-012All customer data is stored and processed within the EUNon-negotiable
REQ-018Biometric login with PIN fallback for every sessionMust ×4
REQ-03199.99% uptime on payment processing, EU-resident failoverArchitect
REQ-044Queue transfers while offline for later executionConflicts · REQ-012
REQ-027Push notification within 5s of every transactionNice ×2
Phase 3 · Blind Deep Dive

AI interviews that never leak the room's opinion.

Each stakeholder is drawn out from scratch by a role-matched persona — at 8:30 PM if that's when they think best. The agent reasons over a frozen snapshot of the PRD internally, so it probes sharply without ever echoing another expert's answer.

  • Role-aware personas probe within 2 seconds, judging saturation before moving on
  • Blind by default — a per-section dial from fully reserved to open reflection
  • Every requirement linked to the stakeholder's verbatim words
roborequirements.com/interview/mei
W

Winston · Solution Architect persona

Blind session — snapshot frozen at start

Evening, Mei. Let's talk scalability — what availability does PocketBank's payment flow actually need?

We need 99.99% uptime on payments.

That implies multi-region failover. Where would that failover store customer data?

CapturedREQ-03199.99% uptime on payments, EU-resident failover
Go deeperMove onShow my list
Phase 4–6 · Reconcile & Adjudicate

Conflicts become decisions, not meetings.

Detection judges every new requirement against the whole PRD, citing the exact IDs it duplicates or contradicts. Stakeholders evaluate everything — Must, Nice, Object or Abstain — and the Lead routes each conflict: decide, open discussion, or mark it needs-escalation.

  • Anything touching a locked non-negotiable is auto-flagged to the top
  • Append-only shared memory — concurrent submissions never block
  • Immutable decision log, assembled PRD, validation gate, Markdown/PDF export
app.roborequirements.com/pocketbank/review

Conflict ledger

1 open · 1 auto-merged · 1 resolved
Non-negotiable violationREQ-044 ↔ REQ-012auto-flagged

"Queue transfers while offline" cannot satisfy locked EU data-residency during store-and-forward.

DecideOpen discussionMark: needs escalation
REQ-036 ≈ REQ-019 duplicate merged by async sweepnever blocked
CONF-007 resolved — failover constrained to EU regionsLead · decision log #14
Engineered for independent thinking

Groupthink is a design flaw. We removed it.

Every mechanism in RoboRequirements protects the signal a group setting would erode — and leaves a paper trail a regulator would envy.

Blind-by-toggle elicitation

Stakeholders never see each other's requirements mid-interview. Per section, the Lead dials disclosure from fully reserved to open, anonymized reflection.

Full-context conflict detection

Every new requirement is judged against the whole PRD — duplicate, conflict or clean — citing the exact requirement IDs and reasoning, with >90% contradiction accuracy.

Forced evaluation

Every stakeholder rates every requirement in their sections: Must-have, Nice-to-have, Object or Abstain. Rubber-stamping is structurally impossible.

Never blocked

Submissions append to shared memory without locks or queues. Concurrent writes always succeed; an async sweep reconciles races into the ledger afterwards.

Immutable decision log

Every ruling — who, why, when, and which route — is recorded append-only. The PRD's version number is the length of its decision log.

Verbatim provenance

Every requirement links back to the exact words and interview session that produced it. Click through from summary to source, always.

Pricing

Choose the plan that works best for you.

Free

Start for free
  • Another amazing feature
  • Limited support
$0.00 / month

FAQ

Do you have any questions? We have got you covered.

Stop scheduling meetings. Start shipping PRDs.

Set the frame, appoint your experts, and let the interviews run overnight. The conflicts will be waiting in one ledger — with every argument attached.

Get started freeTalk to us

Get early access

Be among the first to get access to RoboRequirements.